Digital Maturity Survey for Machine Manufacturers

  • Home
  • Digital Maturity Survey for Machine Manufacturers
(Scoring for Response Options: 1 = Never, 2 = Rarely, 3 = Partially/Manual, 4 = Mostly/Automatic, 5 = Fully/Integrated)
This section measures the integration of finance and project management to ensure that projects are completed on budget and on time.
A1. During the project proposal phase, can a detailed budget for estimated costs (Materials, Labor, Overheads) be generated automatically?
A2. Can project progress (percentage of completion) be compared in real time with actual costs incurred and the remaining budget?
A3. Are all purchase orders and personnel time sheets automatically tracked by being assigned to the relevant Project Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) code?
A4. Are revenue/profit recognition and accounting entries automatically generated in the system based on the project’s percentage of completion?
A5. Is the risk of a project exceeding its budget identified and communicated by the system as an early warning based on budget and actual spending data?
This section measures the speed and accuracy of information flow between the design office and the shop floor.
B1. Is the Bill of Materials (BOM) created in the design (CAD/PLM) system automatically transferred to the manufacturing and procurement systems without manual intervention?
B2. Are configuration or optional changes in a customer order automatically reflected in the correct Bill of Materials (BOM) and production routing?
B3. During production scheduling, does the system automatically consider load/capacity bottlenecks on critical machines and mold waiting times?
B4. Are shop floor operators able to log materials used and time spent in real time through mobile devices or tablets?
B5. In the event of a design error during production, does the system automatically notify the Engineering team via the formal Change Request (ECR/ECO) process?
This section measures the ability to track sold machines throughout their lifecycle and generate revenue from service activities.
C1. Is the warranty coverage and service contract status of a customer-site machine immediately accessible when a new fault is reported?
C2. Is the machine’s history and its previously replaced parts (As-Maintained configuration) accessible to the field technician via a mobile device?
C3. Are service and maintenance operations for a sold machine analyzed clearly as a distinct profit center?
C4. Sahada bir arıza meydana geldiğinde, arızayı gidermek için gereken yedek parçanın stok durumu ve yeri sistemde otomatik olarak kontrol ediliyor mu?
C5. Is the failure data of sold machines (fault type and frequency) systematically transferred to the Engineering team to support improvements in future design projects?